USPTO serial 79062158
KIOTIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KIOTIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps; perfumery goods, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; food supplements for cosmetic purposes; cosmetic products in all galenic forms | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2012 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |