USPTO serial 79062171
AROMATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3683367Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 15, 2009
- Examiner
- HERRERA-MARCUS, ROSELLE MORALDE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AROMATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Aluminium foil | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | Cutlery, cutlery of plastic | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, printed informational cards in the field of food preparation and storage; paper, cardboard and goods made from these materials, namely, paper or cardboard; paper; cardboard and cardboard products, namely, cartons, boxes, containers, tubes, and carriers for food and beverages; wrapping material made of paper or plastic, namely, plastic cling wrap, and paper wrap for packaging food; rubbish sacks, namely, paper and/or plastic garbage bags; boxes and bags of paper or plastic, plastic foils, synthetic plastic foil tubes, cling film for use in microwave ovens; airtight bags, namely, plastic food storage bags for household use; lunch bags, namely, sandwich bags; sandwich wrappers, freezer bags, freezer bags for cooked food, cooking bags for food preparation, bags for ice cubes, storage bags, namely, supply bags to hold ingredients and for general purposes; roasting tubes made of plastic, baking paper, roasting paper, microwave films; labels of plastic, filter paper, absorbent paper for use in food packing | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Cups, cups of paper or plastic; plates, plates of paper and plastic | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named AROMATA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 7, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 10, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |