USPTO serial 79062258
ROSCIOLI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROSCIOLI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Bar and restaurant services; bar services, café and restaurant services; cafés; cafeteria and restaurant services; cafeterias; café-restaurants; canteen services; carry-out restaurants; catering; catering for the provision of food and beverages; catering in fast-food cafeterias; catering of food and drinks; cocktail lounge buffets; cocktail lounges; coffee shops; coffee supply services for offices; coffee-house and snack-bar services; dairy bar services; delicatessens, being restaurants; fast food and non-stop restaurant services; fast-food restaurants and snackbars; food preparation services; ice cream shop services in the nature of restaurants; juice bar services; mobile coffee services for providing food and drink; preparation of food and beverages; providing information about wine characteristics; providing news and information in the field of drinks; pubs; restaurants; restaurant and bar services; restaurant and café services; restaurant and catering services; restaurant services; restaurants featuring home delivery; salad bars; self-service restaurants; serving food and drinks; snack bar and canteen services; snack-bars; take-out restaurants; tavern services; tea rooms; wine bars | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 1, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |