USPTO serial 79062310
ECLIPSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3810966Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 29, 2010
- Examiner
- PATE, TARA J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECLIPSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brierley Hill, West Midlands DY5 1UT, GB
Brierley Hill, West Midlands DY5 1UT, GB
Brierley Hill, West Midlands DY5 1UT, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle L. Visser
MICHELLE L. VISSER RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC39533 WOODWARD AVE STE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5098UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Insect traps; fly catchers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 4, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |