Drawing for LITRON

USPTO serial 79062410

LITRON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3754852Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 2, 2010
Examiner
HERRERA-MARCUS, ROSELLE MORALDE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LITRON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Synthetic Stuffing materials for sleeping bagsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
020Bedding, namely, bed pillows; sleeping bags for camping, sleeping bags incorporating a cushion, sleeping bags incorporating a pillowSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
024Bed blankets made of man-made fibres, sleeping bag sheet liners, sleeping bags bed sheets, fabric for textile use, fabric made from synthetic threads and yarns, fibrous fabrics for insulation purpose, non-woven fabrics of synthetic fabric, lining fabrics, textile linings, quilted blankets for bedding, quilts, quilts filled with stuffing material, quilts filled with synthetic stuffing material; textile sheets, textile fabrics for making into blankets, textile fabrics for making into linens, textile fabrics for use in the manufacturing of bedding, textile goods for use as bedding, textile material, textile piece goods for making bedding covers, textiles made of synthetic materialsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 25, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 14, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 20, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 7, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 7, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 18, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 2, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 15, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 6, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 6, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 22, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 30, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 6, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 16, 2009ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 26, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 6, 2009RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 2, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 2, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 25, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 24, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 19, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance