USPTO serial 79062431
TECHNOTRANS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3744854Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 2, 2010
- Examiner
- RINGLE, JAMES W
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with TECHNOTRANS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sassenberg, DE
Sassenberg, DE
Sassenberg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Trevor P. Schmidt
Trevor P. Schmidt HUTCHISON PLLC701 Corporate Center DriveSuite 250Raleigh, NC 27612Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Printing presses and component parts thereof, namely, dampening solution circulators, cooling apparatus, inking system temperature control devices, dampening devices, dampening solution recycling devices, coating circulators, silicone dispensing devices, dosing devices, ink supply devices; machines for manufacturing optical data carriers in the form of compact discs and laser discs, and component parts thereof, namely, electroplating bath systems composed of a cabinet, pipe work, pump, controller filter and tank, pure water systems composed of a cabinet, pipe work, pump, controller filter and tank, waste water systems composed of a cabinet, pipe work, pump and controller filter, wet-chemical preparation systems composed of a cabinet, pipe work, pump and controller, and punching and polishing machines, each being components of the aforementioned machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| May 15, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 26, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 2, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |