Drawing for DATACENTERDYNAMICS GLOBAL CONFERENCE AND EXPO SERIES

USPTO serial 79062478

DATACENTERDYNAMICS GLOBAL CONFERENCE AND EXPO SERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DATACENTERDYNAMICS GLOBAL CONFERENCE AND EXPO SERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Arranging of exhibitions for business purposes, arranging exhibitions for business purposes, organization of exhibitions for commercial advertising purposesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
041Arranging and conducting of conferences, conducting of business conferencesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 15, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 2, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 14, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 20, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 20, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2009PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Oct 7, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 2, 2009PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 31, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 6, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 29, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 24, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 19, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance