USPTO serial 79062479
IONIT OX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3742611Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 26, 2010
- Examiner
- LOWRY, LEIGH A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with IONIT OX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NATHANIEL D. KRAMER
Nathaniel Kramer Kirschstein, Israel, Schiffmiller & Pieroni425 Fifth AvenueFifth FloorNEW YORK, NY 10016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [ Common metals and their alloys; unwrought and semi-wrought stainless steels and their alloys ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | [ Machines for heat treatment of surfaces; surface nitriding machines; machines for gas nitriding of surfaces ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | [ Precious metals and their alloys ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Surface treatment of machined metal pieces, namely, plasma heat treatment of metal, plasma-etching, applying anti-corrosive finishes to metal parts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sulzer Metco Management AG
- Other trademarks owned by Sulzer Metco Management AG
- Other trademarks owned by Oerlikon Surface Solutions AG, Pfäffikon
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named IONIT OX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2016 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 11, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |