USPTO serial 79062523
DONAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DONAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed food in powdered form made from disintegrated hermatypic coral | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |