Drawing for CRG

USPTO serial 79062764

CRG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3799662Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 8, 2010
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathleen A. Costigan

Kathleen A. Costigan HEDMAN & COSTIGAN, P.C.One Rockefeller Plaza, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10020UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Go-karts; parts of go-karts, namely, engines; sports cars; tires and inner tubes for racing go-karts; vehicle accessories, namely, stone guards, mudguards, splash guards, mudguard trims; front and rear automobile bumpers; motor cars; lorries; mopeds; motorcycles; bicycles; tricycles; tires and inner tubes for vehicles and cars in general; land vehicles and cars; engines for land vehicles, components for cycles, motorcycles, moped and cars, namely, speed changers in the nature of drive gears, steering wheels, brakes, clutches and fendersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 17, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 8, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 20, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 28, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 23, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 10, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 10, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 8, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 8, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 31, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 27, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 27, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 16, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 4, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 4, 2010ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 29, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 18, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 28, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 9, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 9, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 8, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 7, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 29, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 25, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance