USPTO serial 79062767
VIROBUSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIROBUSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Apparatus for lighting, heating, steam generating, cooking, refrigerating, drying, ventilating, water supply and sanitary purposes; apparatus for air conditioning; air ventilating and odour suppressing apparatus and installations; air treatment apparatus and installations; air purifying apparatus and installations; air freshening apparatus and installations; air exhaustion apparatus and installations; hot-air heating apparatus and constructions; disinfection and sterilization apparatus; decontamination apparatus and installations; apparatus and installations for sterilization against viruses, bacteriums, moulds and ferments; filter apparatus and installations; parts of the aforementioned products, including filters, filter elements, filter cartridges and ventilation grids | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2012 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 18, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 27, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |