Drawing for GAÏAFINE

USPTO serial 79062799

GAÏAFINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3734401Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 5, 2010
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GAÏAFINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BREWSTER TAYLOR

BREWSTER TAYLOR STITES & HARBISON PLLC1199 NORTH FAIRFAX STREETSUITE 900ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1437

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for use in industry; chemicals for use in agriculture, horticulture and forestry except fungicides, herbicides, insecticides and parasiticides; unprocessed artificial resins; unprocessed plastics in all forms; adhesives used in industry; chemical reagents other than for medical or veterinary purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
017Semi-worked artificial or synthetic resins as semi-finished products in the form of pellets, rods, foils, foams, fibers, films and sheetsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2019UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
May 3, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 3, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 26, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 12, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 12, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 12, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 16, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 31, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 3, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 5, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 20, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 3, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 27, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 3, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 12, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 5, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 2, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 2, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 1, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 25, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance