USPTO serial 79062801
DURAFRAME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 7, 2010
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with DURAFRAME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
"Durable" Hunke & Jochheim GmbH & Co. Ko
Iserlohn, DE
Other trademarks owned by "Durable" Hunke & Jochheim GmbH & Co. Ko
DURABLE Hunke & Jochheim GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by DURABLE Hunke & Jochheim GmbH & Co. KG
DURABLE Hunke & Jochheim GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by DURABLE Hunke & Jochheim GmbH & Co. KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amanda S. Leitner
Amanda S. Leitner Law Office of Mark P. Stone400 Columbus AvenueValhalla, NY 10595UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [ STANDS OF METAL, NAMELY, FREE-STANDING METAL PANEL UNITS FOR EXHIBITIONS, DISPLAYS AND PARTITIONING; ] SIGN HOLDERS AND POSTER FRAMES OF METAL; METAL HOLDERS FOR SIGNS IN THE NATURE OF FRAMEWORKS OF METAL, FOR AFFIXING TO THE WALL, FOR ATTACHMENT TO A CARRYING FRAME, OR FOR PLACEMENT ON THE GROUND | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | HOLDERS FOR PRINTED INFORMATION CARRIERS, NAMELY, PAPER SIGN HOLDERS, [ POSTER BOARDS, ] DOCUMENT HOLDERS, [ DOCUMENT FILE RACKS, FOR ATTACHING TO DISPLAY FRAMES AND/OR FOR AFFIXING TO THE WALL; ] SLEEVES FOR HOLDING POSTERS, NAMELY, PLASTIC SLEEVES, [ PAPER SLEEVES; ] SLEEVES, NAMELY, PRESENTATION SLEEVES FOR DOCUMENTS, PROTECTIVE COVERS FOR PRINTED SHEETS AND OTHER PAPER DOCUMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | [ DISPLAY STANDS, PHOTO STANDS, AND ] NON-METAL HOLDERS FOR SIGNS; NON-METAL POSTER FRAMES FOR AFFIXING TO THE WALL AND/OR ATTACHING TO A CARRYING FRAME [, NON-METAL POSTER FRAMES FOR PLACEMENT ON THE GROUND, NAMELY, DISPLAY RACKS; DISPLAY BOARDS; ERECTABLE PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, ERECTABLE DISPLAYS, NAMELY, FREE-STANDING NON-METAL PANEL UNITS FOR EXHIBITIONS, DISPLAYS AND PARTITIONING; POINT OF PURCHASE DISPLAYS ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by "Durable" Hunke & Jochheim GmbH & Co. Ko
- Other trademarks owned by DURABLE Hunke & Jochheim GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by DURABLE Hunke & Jochheim GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named DURAFRAME
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 10, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |