Drawing for INTELLIBYPASS

USPTO serial 79062824

INTELLIBYPASS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3708918Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 10, 2009
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with INTELLIBYPASS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Savitch LLP525 B. Street, Suite 2200,San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Water treatment equipment, namely, cartridge filtration blending units containing a mixing valve and control valve constructed as part of water processing apparatus with or without water filters; water treatment equipment, namely, cartridge filtration units with or without water blending filters; water purifying blending apparatus containing a water mixing valve and water control valve as part of water purification and filtration apparatus [ with or ] without enrichment unit [ especially for the admixture of flavouring additives and ingredients for coffee machines and espresso machines, hot drink dispensers and cold drink dispensers, combination steamers and ovens ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 14, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 30, 2020INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 15, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 15, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 8, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 26, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 25, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 23, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 30, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 21, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 10, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 11, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 10, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 2, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 5, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 20, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 20, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 17, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 2, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 2, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 2, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 2, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 30, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 25, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance