USPTO serial 79062887
SMG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3841525Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 31, 2010
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SMG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert S. Pierce
Robert S. Pierce Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC400 7th St., NW, Ste. 800Washington, DC 20004United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines, in particular mobile machines, namely, finishers for smoothing and buffing surfaces, mixers, granulate blowers for scattering rubber granulates, grinders, rotary cutters and milling machines, infilling machines for infilling sand and other materials into synthetic grass surfaces, spreaders, and rollers, all of the foregoing used for the installation and maintenance of plastic floor coverings, synthetic coverings, elastic sub-bases, synthetic sport coverings, synthetic lawn playing areas and floor pavements; spraying machines for structural coatings on sport coverings; mixing machines; grinding machines; milling machines; cleaning and maintenance machines, namely, sweeping machines, carpet sweepers, and vacuum cleaners for floor coverings, carpets, sports field carpets and sport coverings; mechanical appliances, namely, tractor-towed rollers and tractor-towed rakes, used for smoothing floor paving; mechanical appliances, namely, sweepers, rotary brushes, vacuum cleaners, rake blades and rotary snow plows for cleaning, brushing, rotary snow plowing and snow removing from roads, sidewalks, playgrounds, and sport playing areas; all of the aforementioned machines also as add-on units for vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Manually operated tools, namely, edge trimmers, glue applicators, gripping tongs, pressure tools, namely, hand-operated tampers, crimpers, tension jacks and pull-line cutters, circle cutters, grass cutters, turf cutters, rollers, trowels, hand-operated sprayers used with floor coverings, synthetic lawns and synthetic sports coverings, drills, spatulas, scrapers, rakes, manually operated dibbers and shovels, all of the foregoing used for installation of floor coverings, synthetic lawns and synthetic sports coverings | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Vehicles, in particular tractors, municipal and small tractors, carts for transporting floor coverings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SMG Sportplatzmaschinenbau GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by SMG Sportplatzmaschinenbau GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by SMG Sportplatzmaschinenbau GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by SMG Sportplatzmaschinenbau Vermietungs- und Verpac
- Other trademarks owned by SMG Sportplatzmaschinenbau GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named SMG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 18, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |