Drawing for ROMET

USPTO serial 79062902

ROMET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VENGROFF, MARILYN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROMET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Bicycles, scooters, motor-bicycles, small motorbikes, motorcycles, quad motorbikes, go-karts, spare parts for bicycles, scooters, motor-bicycles, small motorbikes, motorcycles, quad motorbikes, and go-karts, tyres for bicycles, scooters, motor-bicycles, small motorbikes, motorcycles, quad motorbikes, and go-kartsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
037Repairs of bicycles, scooters, motor-bicycles, small motorbikes, motorcycles, quad motorbikes, and go-kartsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 22, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 18, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 11, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 28, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 27, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 11, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 13, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 6, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 2, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 1, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 31, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 25, 2008REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance