USPTO serial 79062929
LIGHTWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3734405Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 5, 2010
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with LIGHTWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Alumit
John Alumit ALUMIT IP135 S. Jackson Street, Suite 200GLENDALE, CA 91205UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal building materials, namely, metal pipes for conveying daylight into building interiors, metal tube for conveying daylight into building interiors, and metal skylights for buildings | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | [ Solar collectors for heating water; lighting tubes and replacement parts therefore for use in lighting building interiors by conveying daylight; and vehicle headlights ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | [ Mirrors, for use in connection with skylights for conveying daylight into building interiors ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JACOBB Management, a.s.
- Other trademarks owned by Lightway s.r.o.
- Other trademarks owned by Lightway s.r.o.
- Other trademarks owned by Lightway s.r.o.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named LIGHTWAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2021 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 25, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 27, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2015 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 11, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 30, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |