USPTO serial 79062964
OD-OS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3821953Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 20, 2010
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with OD-OS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
14513 Teltow, DE
14513 Teltow, DE
14513 Teltow, DE
14513 TELTOW, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D. Wells
Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical instruments and apparatus for diagnoses and therapy in the field of ophthalmology | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological research services; technological maintenance services, namely, repair of computer software; computer hardware and software design and development services; all of the foregoing services are in connection with medical care in the field of ophthalmology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OD-OS GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by OD-OS GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by OD-OS GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by SensoMotoric Instruments GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named OD-OS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 14, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |