Drawing for SEASCOUT

USPTO serial 79062977

SEASCOUT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3818451Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 13, 2010
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEASCOUT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter A. Chiabotti

Peter A. Chiabotti Akerman LLPP.O. Box 3188West Palm Beach, FL 33402-3188UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric navigational instruments for sea-going ships; nautical navigation apparatus for sea-going ships in the nature of on-board computers; marine radar apparatus for sea-going ships, namely, radar and radar operational software; data processors and pre-recorded data carriers with navigational software and featuring information regarding navigational buoys; and radar operational software for marine radar for sea going ships featuring anti-collision functions that are displayed on a screenSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 3, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 17, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 23, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 17, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 17, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 13, 2015REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 27, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 27, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 13, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 27, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 18, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 24, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 24, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 13, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 13, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 13, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 13, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 13, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 13, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance