Drawing for BAZEPORT

USPTO serial 79062988

BAZEPORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3737112Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 12, 2010
Examiner
HABEEB, MYRIAH A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAZEPORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth Motolenich-Salas

Kenneth Motolenich-Salas Weiss and Moy, PC4204 N. Brown AvenueScottsdale, AZ 85251UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for providing real-time, integrated business management intelligenceSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 19, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 1, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 2, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 24, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 19, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 19, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 14, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 29, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 14, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 13, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 12, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 12, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 27, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 22, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 17, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 2, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 27, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 27, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 27, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 31, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 24, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 13, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 12, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 12, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 10, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance