USPTO serial 79062994
VITACOLOGY JUST NATURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3722568Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 8, 2009
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VITACOLOGY JUST NATURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CH
F-44350 GUERANDE, FR
F-44350 GUERANDE, FR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps; perfumes, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifrices; depilatories; make-up removing preparations; lipstick; beauty masks; shaving products, namely, shaving balm, shaving creams, shaving gels, shaving lotions, shaving soaps; certified organic cosmetics | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 26, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 31, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 23, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |