Drawing for ONE USE PLUS SBK

USPTO serial 79063012

ONE USE PLUS SBK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3728576Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 22, 2009
Examiner
CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ONE USE PLUS SBK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLP1 Chase RoadLackenbach Siegel BuildingScarsdale, NY 10583-4156

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical apparatus and instrument for ophthalmic surgeryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 4, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 26, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 17, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 22, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 5, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 23, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 21, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2015CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2015EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Mar 31, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 12, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 22, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 6, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 1, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 1, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 26, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 25, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 25, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 25, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 25, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 24, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 7, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance