Drawing for EVOLVE BEAUTY

USPTO serial 79063073

EVOLVE BEAUTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVOLVE BEAUTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps; shampoos, bath gels, shower gels; deodorants for personal use; non-medicated toilet preparations; non-medicated skin care preparations for use in the bath and the shower; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions, dentrifrices, massage and aromatherapy oils and constituents; cosmetics, hair conditioner; skin and hair care products, namely, face and body creams, body balm, skin cleansers, skin toners, lip balm, facial masks, facial scrubsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 21, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 22, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 31, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 31, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 31, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 31, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 3, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 13, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 18, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 18, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 3, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 3, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 18, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 18, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2009CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Aug 17, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 17, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 6, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 5, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 7, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance