Drawing for PERECT

USPTO serial 79063078

PERECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3712275Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 17, 2009
Examiner
FATHY, DOMINIC
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with PERECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Alumit

John Alumit ALUMIT IP135 S. Jackson Street, Suite 200Glendale, CA 91205UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Toothbrushes; toothpicks; floss for dental purposes; toothbrushes, electric; nail brushes; toilet brushes; scrubbing brushes; brushes for cleaning tanks and containers; water apparatus for cleaning teeth and gums for home use; toothpick holders, not of precious metalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 14, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 17, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 8, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 8, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 27, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 12, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 17, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 1, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 12, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 28, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 17, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 17, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 1, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 6, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 5, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 7, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance