USPTO serial 79063100
FIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3810973Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 29, 2010
- Examiner
- HAMPTON, CHARISMA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with FIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven L. Underwood
Steven L. Underwood PRICE HENEVELD LLP695 KENMOOR SEGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49546UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ GRINDING TOOLS FOR GRINDING MACHINES ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | [ HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, MANUALLY-OPERATED CUTTING AND GRINDING WHEELS, CORE GRINDING DRILLS, FILES, WIRE CUTTERS IN THE NATURE OF SAWING WIRES AND REAMERS; DRILL BITS FOR HAND DRILLS, NAMELY, CORE GRINDING DRILL SHANKS ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | GRINDING TOOLS, NAMELY, CUTTING AND GRINDING DISCS, DENTAL BURRS, DENTAL DRILLS, DENTAL HAND PIECES AND DENTAL PLASTER TRIMMER WHEELS FOR DENTAL APPLICATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Finzler, Schrock & Kimmel GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Finzler, Schrock & Kimmel GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Finzler, Schrock & Kimmel GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named FIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2020 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2020 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 17, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 18, 2020 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 26, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 18, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |