USPTO serial 79063137
SWEETGREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3799667Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 8, 2010
- Examiner
- MORENO, PAUL A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SWEETGREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maureen C. Kassner
Maureen C. Kassner Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP2005 Market Street, Suite 2200One Commerce SquarePhiladelphia, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Seeds and plant seeds for vegetables; fresh vegetables | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2019 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2010 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 3, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |