USPTO serial 79063164
IDEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4061911Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 29, 2011
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IDEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy T. Wang
Timothy T. Wang Ni, Wang & Massand, PLLC8140 Walnut Hill Lane, Suite 500Dallas, TX 75231UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | [ Air purifying apparatus and machines; air filtering installations; freezers; ] toilet bowls; [ ornamental fountains; electric kettles; ] toilet seats; [ water softening apparatus and installations; solar water heaters; bath tubs for sitz-baths ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JIANGMEN HANYU ELECTRICAL CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by JIANGMEN HANYU ELECTRICAL CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Hanyu Group Joint-Stock Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named IDEAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 29, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | IRIV | IRREGULARITY ON INVALIDATION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 15, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 9, 2018 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 29, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 12, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |