USPTO serial 79063180
MELLE NATURELLE, ÉCOCITOYENNE, ELLE PRÉSERVE L'EAU, ELLE ÉCONOMISE L'ÉNERGIE, ELLE PROTÈGE LA NATURE.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MELLE NATURELLE, ÉCOCITOYENNE, ELLE PRÉSERVE L'EAU, ELLE ÉCONOMISE L'ÉNERGIE, ELLE PROTÈGE LA NATURE.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; soaps; perfumes, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifrices; depilatories; make-up removing preparations; lipsticks; beauty masks; shaving products; leather preservatives (polishes); creams for leather | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | Jewelry; precious stones; horological and chronometric instruments; precious metals and alloys thereof; coins; works of art of precious metal; jewelry cases; boxes of precious metal; watch cases, straps, chains, springs or glasses; fancy key rings; statues or figurines (statuettes) of precious metal; clock and watch cases; medals | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 026 | Lace and embroidery, ribbons and braid; buttons, hooks and eyes, pins and needles; artificial flowers; haberdashery (except threads and yarns); false beards, hair and moustaches; lace trimmings; wigs; clothing fasteners or clasps; hair ornaments | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FOLIES DOUCES
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named MELLE NATURELLE, ÉCOCITOYENNE, ELLE PRÉSERVE L'EAU, ELLE ÉCONOMISE L'ÉNERGIE, ELLE PROTÈGE LA NATURE.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 24, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 1, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 31, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |