USPTO serial 79063336
HUNTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4211976Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 25, 2012
- Examiner
- BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HUNTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RTNTRD Rolf Trautwein und Nadine Trautwein Research & Development GbR
DE
Other trademarks owned by RTNTRD Rolf Trautwein und Nadine Trautwein Research & Development GbR
Nadine Trautwein und Rolf Trautwein GbR Research & Development
DE
Other trademarks owned by Nadine Trautwein und Rolf Trautwein GbR Research & Development
Nadine Trautwein und Rolf Trautwein GbR Research & Development
DE
Other trademarks owned by Nadine Trautwein und Rolf Trautwein GbR Research & Development
DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter S. Sloane
Peter S. Sloane LEASON ELLIS LLPONE BARKER AVENUE, FIFTH FLOORWHITE PLAINS, NY 10601-1526UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | [ Articles for equitation, namely, saddles, fastenings for saddles, stirrup leathers, stirrup pads of nylon, stirrup pads, snaffle bridles, kerb bridles, reins, bearing-reins, bits for animals, chambons, gogues, horse blankets, whips, stable halters, saddlebags, riding crops, martingales, pony snaffle bridles, pony-halters, spats, pads for horse saddles, saddle cloths, saddle pillows, riding halter, pony riding cushion, pony-horse saddles, pony saddle pads, pony-spats, pony-blanket straps, pony martingales, cavessons, lunging surcingles, lunge lines, lunge pieces, vaulting surcingle, whips for lunging, neck extender, spats for transport and blanket straps; horse tack, namely, buckled straps, horse clothing bibs, spur straps of leather, head collars for stable made of leather, paddock laces, saddle rack made of leather and leather similar material, snaffle halter made of leather and leather similar material, chin laces, hat cases made of leather, whips, horse blankets and cushions; ] leather goods and leather imitated goods for dogs, namely, dog clothing; [ brief cases, pocket wallets, general purpose bags for carrying camping equipment, reusable shopping bags, wallets, suitcases, ] handbags and travelling bags [, suit bags; stirrups, pony-stirrups, boots for horses, namely, bell boots; protection for eyes, ears and protection from flies, namely, horse eye veils; horse tether halters; transport headgear for horses, horse tail schooner, horse protective padding, namely, knee caps for horses ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RTNTRD Rolf Trautwein und Nadine Trautwein Research & Development GbR
- Other trademarks owned by Nadine Trautwein und Rolf Trautwein GbR Research & Development
- Other trademarks owned by Nadine Trautwein und Rolf Trautwein GbR Research & Development
- Other trademarks owned by Hunter Holding GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named HUNTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 7, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 25, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 25, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 22, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 31, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |