Drawing for SOGA

USPTO serial 79063396

SOGA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3746961Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 9, 2010
Examiner
LOOK, JEFFREY J
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SOGA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stewart J. Bellus

Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576-1614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Single phase electrical motors and single phase electrical motors with a high starting torque for machines; three phase electrical motors and two speed phase electrical motors for machines; flat motors for machines; self braking motors for machines; asynchronous generators for generating electricity, for use with land vehicles, for use with wind turbines; permanent magnet alternators for use in generating electricity, for use with land vehicles, for use with wind turbines and in frequency convertersACTIVE—
009Rotary convertersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 8, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 31, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 3, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 14, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2016C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 11, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 10, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 25, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 1, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 1, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 9, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 9, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 24, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 4, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 19, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 16, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 8, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 6, 2009PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 21, 2009PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 14, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 6, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 13, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 12, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 12, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 12, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 11, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 9, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance