Drawing for INSPECT

USPTO serial 79063471

INSPECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3767575Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 30, 2010
Examiner
LOOK, JEFFREY J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INSPECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil F. Greenblum

Neil F. Greenblum Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Data processing equipment and computers, namely, circuit boards provided with integrated circuits, electronic circuit boards, signal processors, interface cards for data processing equipment in the form of printed circuits, encoded integrated circuit cards, namely, smart cards containing programming used to handle data between hardware and PC interfaces, real time data evaluation, and to control hardware components, computer hardware and computer peripheral devices; software for data recording, visualization, evaluation, storage, and parameter handlingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto, namely, scientific research; design, engineering, research, development and testing services in the field of non-destructive testing; industrial analysis and research services, namely, testing or research on machines, apparatus and instruments; computer hardware development; computer programming and software designSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jan 25, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 4, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 6, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Jul 6, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jul 4, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 4, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Feb 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 19, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 16, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jun 30, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 30, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 12, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 12, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 10, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 10, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 21, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 4, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Nov 4, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Nov 4, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Nov 4, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 7, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
May 7, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 7, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 30, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 29, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 13, 2009RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 13, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jan 12, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 12, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jan 12, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 11, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 9, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 8, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance