USPTO serial 79063575
STEINBERG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3680023Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 8, 2009
- Examiner
- HAMMEL, LAURA A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with STEINBERG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marisa A. Roberts
Marisa A. Roberts Roberts & Roberts, LLP, Attorneys at LawP. O. Box 484Princeton, NJ 08542-0484UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer peripheral equipment for multimedia applications, in particular for recording and processing of tones and sounds, in particular music; electronic audio mixers, electronic sound mixers, electronic studio audio mixers, electronic studio sound mixers; micro-phones adopted for being connected to electronic data processing equipment, electronic adapters and interfaces for connecting electric and electronic equipment for producing and processing music to electronic data processing equipment, in particular to computers, for data communication; apparatus for recording sound and images; apparatus for reproduction of sound and images; apparatus for recording and reproduction of sound and images; computer hardware, in particular such for multimedia applications, in particular for the electronic recording, processing, creation and/or reproduction of tones or sounds, in particular music; computer software and other data processing programs, in particular such for multimedia application, in particular for recording, processing, creation and/or reproduction of tones or sounds, in particular music, aforementioned goods on data carriers as well as for download, in particular via Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | [ Technical design of computer hardware and computer peripheral equipment, in particular for multi-media applications, in particular for recording, processing, creation and/or reproduction of tones and sounds, in particular music; design and programming of computer software and other data processing programs, in particular for multimedia applications, in particular for recording, processing, creation and/or reproduction of tones and sounds, in particular music ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named STEINBERG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2020 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 8, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 24, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |