Drawing for [COMFORT ZONE] SPACE

USPTO serial 79063626

[COMFORT ZONE] SPACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3781296Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 27, 2010
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with [COMFORT ZONE] SPACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Judith L. Grubner

Judith L. Grubner Arnstein & Lehr LLP120 S. Riverside Plaza, Ste. 1200Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail shops featuring perfumery and cosmeticsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
044Beauty salons, health spa services for health and wellness of the body and spirit, beauty spa services, namely, cosmetic body care, cosmetic treatment services, namely, body wraps, mud treatments, seaweed treatments, hydrotherapy baths, and body scrubs, hairdressing, hairdressing salonSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2019UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 14, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 14, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 1, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 4, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 4, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 2, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 2, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 1, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 12, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 27, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 27, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 9, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 5, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 5, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 14, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 15, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 29, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 5, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 5, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 4, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2009RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Feb 28, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 16, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance