Drawing for DINGO

USPTO serial 79063650

DINGO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3731604Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 29, 2009
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DINGO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Theodore D. Lienesch

Theodore D. Lienesch Thompson Hine LLP10050 Innovation Drive, Suite 400Miamisburg, OH 45342-4934UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Motor vehicles, namely, military land vehicles, in particular in armored, mine-safe design, used to transport military personnel and goods, not intended for use as earth moving machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 20, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 6, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 5, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 5, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 5, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 15, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 6, 2011CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jul 30, 2011CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 25, 2011DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 26, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 26, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 29, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 13, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 9, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 1, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 1, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 21, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2009CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Mar 20, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 24, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 24, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 23, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 16, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance