USPTO serial 79063652
GERMGUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3835161Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 17, 2010
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GERMGUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NL-3632 AX LOENEN AAN DE VECHT, NL
NL-3632 AX LOENEN AAN DE VECHT, NL
NL-3632 AX LOENEN AAN DE VECHT, NL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning preparations [ ; soaps; cosmetics ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Sanitary preparations for medical purposes; skin disinfectants; fungicides; disinfecting substances for hygienic purposes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Aseptix Research BV
- Other trademarks owned by Aseptix Research BV
- Other trademarks owned by Aseptix Research BV
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named GERMGUARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 12, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |