Drawing for GOS

USPTO serial 79063722

GOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3708931Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 10, 2009
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with GOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLP1 Chase RoadLackenbach Siegel BuildingScarsdale, NY 10583-4156

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006[Metal recessed and external handles for doors and windows; metal door knobs and metal window handles; angle plates of metal for assembling metal door and window frames; metal u-bolts for joining metal sections for assembling window and door frames; metal joint connectors for doors and windows;] metal pulleys for sliding doors and for sliding windowsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 3, 2020INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 3, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 9, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 10, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 28, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 14, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 7, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 14, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 4, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2016C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 15, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 3, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 10, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 10, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 11, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 10, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 25, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 5, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 20, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 20, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 9, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 24, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2009RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 27, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 27, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 27, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 26, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance