Drawing for PERCORSI D'ALTURA LA VIS

USPTO serial 79063781

PERCORSI D'ALTURA LA VIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3754861Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 2, 2010
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERCORSI D'ALTURA LA VIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert H. Cameron

ROBERT H. CAMERON ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON101 N. TRYON STREETSUITE 1900CHARLOTTE, NC 28246

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines, spirits and liqueursSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 15, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 15, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 2, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 19, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 7, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 7, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 23, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 22, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2010FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 18, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 2, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 15, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 10, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 6, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 28, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 28, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 6, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2009DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jul 27, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 14, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 29, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 4, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 3, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 2, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 23, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance