USPTO serial 79063893
REYMAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3752435Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 23, 2010
- Examiner
- LOOK, JEFFREY J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REYMAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SOGUIMA -; COMÉRCIO E INDÚSTRIA ALIMENTAR, S.A.
Guimarães, PT
Other trademarks owned by SOGUIMA -; COMÉRCIO E INDÚSTRIA ALIMENTAR, S.A.
SOGUIMA -; COMÉRCIO E INDÚSTRIA ALIMENTAR, S.A.
Guimarães, PT
Other trademarks owned by SOGUIMA -; COMÉRCIO E INDÚSTRIA ALIMENTAR, S.A.
SOGUIMA -; COMÉRCIO E INDÚSTRIA ALIMENTAR, S.A.
Guimarães, PT
Other trademarks owned by SOGUIMA -; COMÉRCIO E INDÚSTRIA ALIMENTAR, S.A.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN ALUMIT, ALEX PATEL & EVAN ANDERSON
16830 VENTURA BLVD.SUITE 360ENCINO, CA 941436Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Cod salted and dried, frozen cod and frozen fish | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SOGUIMA -; COMÉRCIO E INDÚSTRIA ALIMENTAR, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by SOGUIMA -; COMÉRCIO E INDÚSTRIA ALIMENTAR, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by SOGUIMA -; COMÉRCIO E INDÚSTRIA ALIMENTAR, S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named REYMAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 30, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 23, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 28, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |