Drawing for MITO

USPTO serial 79063996

MITO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3734426Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 5, 2010
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MITO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank P. Presta

Frank P. Presta Nixon & Vanderhye PC901 North Glebe Road11th FloorArlington, VA 22203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Engines for land vehicles and structural parts therefor; motorcycles, mopeds and structural parts thereforSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 9, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 14, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 26, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 14, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 12, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 12, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 30, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 9, 2011RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 4, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 3, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 5, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 20, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 17, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 16, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 14, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 8, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 8, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 8, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 19, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 3, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 13, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 13, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 30, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2009SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance