Drawing for LUMA

USPTO serial 79064066

LUMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3744869Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 2, 2010
Examiner
HAMPTON, CHARISMA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David B. Kirschstein, Esq.

David B. Kirschstein, Esq. Kirschstein Israel Schiffmiller & Pieron425 Fifth Avenue, 5th FloorNew York, NY 10016-2223UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed matter for use in connection with advertising the goods and services of others, namely, brochures, advertising pamphlets, leaflets and point of sale materials in the nature of advertising signs of paper or cardboard relating to various fields, namely, automotive, finance, insurance, retail, real estate, utilities, cosmetics, medicine, food and beverage industry, hospitality, government and marketingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035Advertising; business management; business administration; office functionsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
038Electronic mail; communications by telephone; communications by computer terminalsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific research and technological services and research and design in the field of computer software, computer hardware, website development, web design and design of computer software for developing the internet applications for others; industrial analysis and research services in the field of computer software, computer hardware, website development, web design and design of computer software for developing internet applications; design and development of computers and softwareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 24, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 16, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 19, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 9, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 9, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 21, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 10, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 26, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 26, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 2, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 2, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 17, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 10, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 6, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 15, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 5, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 3, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 3, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 8, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 7, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 7, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 17, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 14, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 13, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 6, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance