USPTO serial 79064115
POCKET NAPKINS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3879200Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 23, 2010
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POCKET NAPKINS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dernbach, DE
Dernbach, DE
Dernbach, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper, cardboard and paperboard and goods made of paper or cellulose paper, namely, table covers, tray doilies, place mats, doilies, and table cloths; coasters made of paper, in particular for glasses and carafes; tray covers of paper; drip catchers in the nature of mat and spouts made of paper for catching drips from beverages containers, made of paper; paper covers for cup handles and for holding drink cans and dishes, paper covers for drinking vessels, glasses, cans, toothbrush glasses; loose covers as a heat protection for cups, small cans, and dishes, made of paper; bibs for children and bibs for adults, made of paper; paper liners for soap boxes; beer coaster, made of paper, printed paper strips for advertising purposes for attachment to drinking glasses and cream containers, made of paper; covers for bolster, made of paper; tissues of paper for removing make-up; ink reservoirs; paper and cardboard for packaging; packaging for bottles, made of cardboard and paper; plastic and paper bags for packaging; protective covers of paper for packaging; the aforementioned goods also punched or self-adhesive, as well as in stamped and printed form | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Shoe sponges for cleaning, non-electric shoe cleaning stripes in the nature of shoe polishing mitts; shoe cleaning gloves, drip catchers, not made of paper, in particular drip mats for glasses, drip mats for cans; coasters, not made of paper and not being table-linen; covers for glasses being dish covers, and loose covers for cans as a dirt and insect protection not made of paper; plastic liners for soap-boxes, cream containers, not made of paper, namely, creamer pitchers; loose covers as heat protection for dishes, cups, small cans, not made of paper | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Textiles and textile goods, except napkins and napkin bags, made not of paper, in particular table linen, table cloths, place mats; punching articles made of fleece, including air-laid fleece, in particular table cloth, tray doilies, place mats, tray cloths in the nature of a coaster; non-paper doilies; covers for bolsters, made of textile; tissue for removing make-up, made of textile or fleece | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 026 | Egg-cosies | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mank GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Mank GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Mank GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named POCKET NAPKINS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2018 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 7, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 15, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |