Drawing for AEROTECH

USPTO serial 79064181

AEROTECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AEROTECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Vehicles; apparatus for locomotion by land, air or waterSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
017Rubber, gutta-percha, gum, asbestos, mica and goods made from these materials and not included in other classes; plastics in extruded form for use in manufacture; packing, stopping and insulating materials; flexible pipes, not of metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 5, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 7, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 17, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 16, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 9, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 23, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 8, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 8, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 9, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 6, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 11, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 11, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 11, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 10, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 6, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance