USPTO serial 79064206
CUBIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERRERA-MARCUS, ROSELLE MORALDE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CUBIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Furniture, mirrors, picture frames; shelves and shelving systems consisting thereof, shelf modules (not included in other classes) as parts or accessories of the aforementioned goods; interior decoration (not included in other classes) of wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum and substitutes for all these materials, or of plastics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Aug 31, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2009 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |