Drawing for TOTAL ENERGETIC WELLNESS

USPTO serial 79064247

TOTAL ENERGETIC WELLNESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOTAL ENERGETIC WELLNESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical, medical, dental and veterinary apparatus and instrumentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
011Apparatus for lighting, heating, steam generating, cooking, refrigerating, drying, ventilating, water supply and sanitary purposes, particularly showersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
044Medical services; veterinary services; hygienic and beauty care for human beings or animalsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 4, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 3, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 16, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 30, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 15, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 15, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 15, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 14, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 17, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 17, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 14, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 13, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance