USPTO serial 79064249
INFRACAPITAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3715490Status 780Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 24, 2009
- Examiner
- SHOSHO II, ERNEST
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with INFRACAPITAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DYAN M. HOUSE
DYAN M. HOUSE BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP1900 N. PEARL STREET,SUITE 1500DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | [ Financial management; financial services, namely, financial advisory and consultancy services, financial analysis and research services, financial forecasting, financial planning and financing services for the securing of funds; ] investment services, namely, investment management and consultation; [ capital investment; ] private equity investment; investment in infrastructure | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2025 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2024 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 24, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |