Drawing for RIVER

USPTO serial 79064298

RIVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RIVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Agricultural, horticultural and forestry products, namely, live plants, cut flowers, live shrubs and perennials, seeds for agricultural and horticultural purposes, living plants and natural flowers; none of the foregoing for use as fresh applesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 27, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 4, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 12, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 30, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 15, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 15, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 12, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 16, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 16, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 3, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 26, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 28, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 13, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance