Drawing for CONVINCE

USPTO serial 79064354

CONVINCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3728640Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 22, 2009
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONVINCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JULIE A. GREENBERG

Julie A. Greenberg Dinsmore & Shohl LLPPO Box 7021Troy, MI 48007-7021UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Three dimensional measuring machines for quality inspection (point cloud inspection), software for generation of 3D production data, software for 3D modeling, visualization and analysis and for quality inspection (point cloud inspection), electrical apparatus for use in production control, namely, scanners, computer databases for storing 3D production dataSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 19, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 27, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 22, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 18, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2016C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 21, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 16, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 14, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 23, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 22, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 22, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 28, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 25, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2009RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 23, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 23, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 21, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 20, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2009RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Feb 19, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 18, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 13, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance