USPTO serial 79064424
IMPERGUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3885478Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 7, 2010
- Examiner
- FATHY, DOMINIC
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with IMPERGUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrery H. Greger
Jeffrery H. Greger Hauptman Ham, LLP2318 Mill RoadSuite 1400Alexandria, VA 22314-2866Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical products for impregnating, coating for protection and/or waterproofing of surfaces in all materials and especially for floors, used for textile articles especially carpets, fitted carpets, curtains, for goods made of leather and imitation leather, for furniture and furnishings; chemical products for protection against stains | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 13, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 20, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |