USPTO serial 79064461
FISCHERTECHNIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3964385Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 24, 2011
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with FISCHERTECHNIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Waldachtal, DE
DE
DE
DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J. Bellus
Stewart J. Bellus COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVD.ROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Kits for building three dimensional prototype models of structures, comprised of miniature building blocks, links therefore, and electrically operated motors, for use in schools and universities for educational purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Instructional and teaching materials, namely, magazines and pamphlets relating generally to construction kits comprising miniature building blocks and miniature building block connecting elements for use in schools and universities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by fischertechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by fischerwerke GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by fischerwerke GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by fischerwerke GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named FISCHERTECHNIK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 8, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |