USPTO serial 79064476
HAGERTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HAGERTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cleaning and stain removing preparations, namely, liquid household cleaners, shampoos, shampoo concentrates, foam shampoos, dry shampoos, stain removers for removal of stains on carpets, rugs, upholstery and clothing, except disposable wipes impregnated with chemicals or compounds for household use; preparations for the care of furniture, floors, and other household surfaces and lightings and other household objects, namely, wood floor cleaners, hard floor cleaners, carpet and floor cleaners and cleaners for lighting and other household objects, foam cleaners for oriental rugs, carpets, upholstery, car upholstery, cleaners for all water resistant hard floors such as marble, ceramic tiles, natural stone, linoleum, cleaners for sealed parquet and laminate; cleaning and impregnation preparations, namely, preparations for carpets, rugs, upholstery, curtains, cushions, blankets, tablecloths and other household textile goods and articles of clothing containing soil retardants; preparations for degreasing and removal of wax, oil and other residues from furniture, floors and other household surfaces, namely, degreaser and remover of wax, oil and other residues from furniture floors and other household surfaces; cleaning preparations incorporating substances for control of allergens, namely, household cleaners incorporating substances for control of allergens, spray on anti-mite and deodorizer for mattresses, upholstery and textiles; cleaning preparations impregnated into gloves, rags, all for use in cleaning household surfaces and objects, namely, household cleaners impregnated into gloves, rags, cloths and wipes, all for use in cleaning household surfaces and objects except disposable wipes impregnated with chemicals or compounds for household use and except chemically impregnated polishing gloves | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2013 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 13, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |